Camera
-
Oh no, not a lens test
Well yes and no.
Yes I’m checking out a “new” lens I have, but no I’m not taking photos of brick walls and newspapers to pixel peep corner sharpness and other crap like that.
A few guys i know have started using a lot of older manual focus lenses on their DSLR’s with terrific results. I’ve always been interested in doing this myself, but have never got around to it. That has now changed. Why shoot with old manual focus lenses on a DSLR? Well….- Its a way of using some of the greatest lenses ever made (ie. there a massive variety of lenses to try),
- They’re generally smaller, lighter, and cheaper than modern lenses,
- Many have unique characteristics and draw nicer than modern lenses,
- Build quality that still shits over most modern lenses,
- Trying something different for the hell of it.
As you can see, there are several good reasons to consider using older lenses.
From using film cameras recently, I’d already built up quite a selection of Zuiko lenses for my Olympus OM bodies. Luckily, Zuiko have made some of the best lenses in history ( you cant dispute that its a fact), so i got a cheap adapter off ebay to start using them on my DSLR.I’m not going to keep rambling on, so I’ll cut to the chase.
This afternoon i attached my newest Zuiko, a humble and underrated 100mm f/2.8 that cost me $55 including postage from the U.S. The light was going down, and the wind was pretty strong, but f/2.8 is still pretty respectable even if it’s not exactly “fast”.
Here is what i came up with shooting wide open at f/2.8 at 200ISO. There is no processing whatsoever, its straight from the RAW. No sharpening, no level/colour adjustments. I’ve also included a 100% crop of the imageShooting with a manual focus lens on the 400D isn’t the best combination you can think of. The viewfinder is pretty small, and it doesn’t have a focus screen designed for manual focus lenses. You can buy them and they’re relatively cheap, but i probably wont bother unless i upgrade to full frame. I’ll definitely be using my other manual focus lenses form now on though and I’m looking forward to using the 100mm for some portrait work.
-
Black Beauties
Ok, haven’t posted up any film shots for a while.. No working film scanner means no scans. So you have to suffer through a couple more shots of new cameras than have found their way to me lately.
The first is a terrific 124G. Been liking this medium format thing lately, so I’ve bought my own camera just in case I have to give the RB67 back (I’m hoping my friend forgets i have it). The Yashica 124G is a 6×6 medium format TLR that was built in between 1971 and 1986. It has a very good reputation as an entry level medium format camera with an astounding 80cm f/3.5 Yashinon lens.
There is also a non “G” model (ie. Yashica 124), that appears to sell for considerably less than the 124G. They’re actually exactly the same except for the external finish of the camera. The optics are exactly the same, and there are rumours that the 124 has stronger internal gears than the 124G. Too bad I couldn’t find a 124 anywhere for sale that was in working condition, luckily the 124G is still pretty cheap (if you look around a bit).
Here’s a quick pic of it
I also got these 2 OM’s for an offer I just couldn’t refuse.
One is in amazing condition, the other nice and brassed up. I actually have something special planned for the “roughie”.
-
The golfer
Well now that my film scanner is dead I’ve been shooting some more digital lately.
Tonight my dad was working on his latest sculpture. It’s a commissioned work for one of Australia’s leading golf clubs. It’s quite an adventurous project actually. Golf is generally a conservative sport, especially when played on private courses which adhere to strict rules and tradition. Having a naked golfer at the entrance to you club isn’t something that a lot of people would be comfortable with. The club and members are making quite a bold statement and representatives from the R&A (golf’s governing body) loved the idea so much they’re footing most of the bill and are coming back over from Scotland for the unveiling which should be next year.
Anyway, I just got a couple shots of him tonight to check out the lighting conditions etc. I’ll be taking some black and white film shots at a later date.Click the images for a larger view, especially the second. I just stitched two shots together for some fun. No real post processing done at all.

-
Bessa Rangefinder Calibration
No matter what rangefinder you use, there’s a good chance that you’ll need to have the rangefinder calibrated one time or another. This is no big deal if you’re aware that the problem can happen (often as a result of bumping or dropping the camera)
Some cameras will need adjustment more than others, and the Voigtlander Bessa range seem to be more prone to rangefinder misalignment than others (this can be said for the Epson RD as well, which is basically a digital Bessa).
Many older cameras have a pretty simple adjustment process, and there’s quite a lot of info on the net documenting the process. However much of the Bessa range is still relatively new, and at first it seems as though the whole adjustment process is a guarded secret. Naturally, many Bessa owners weren’t too keen on paying a full service fee for a 10 minute RF alignment, so they begun to search for ways to do it themselves.There’s quite a lot of info floating around the internet on this subject, but I noticed much of it either lacked pictures or description of “simple” steps. I’ve attempted to combine all of my research together in one place and provide some instructions based off my own personal experience. This process was completed on a Bessa R3A, however I’m told most of the Bessa range is very similar.
*Disclaimer. It’s recommended you ignore these instructions and get your Bessa calibrated by a registered Voigtlander technician if :
- You don’t have experience pulling apart and fixing cameras,
- You’re not confident with small tools,
- You’re clumsy,
- You don’t take responsibility for your own actions and will want to blame your broken camera on me.
1. First of all, to calibrate the rangefinder you won’t necessarily need to take the entire top plate off. It is possible to remove part of the hot shoe that will give you access to the adjustment screws. This can be a tricky process particularly if you don’t want to scratch the black paint on your hot shoe. You’ll need a small flat head screwdriver or even a toothpick to wedge and pop/lift up the cover plate illustrated in the photo below.

When you lift the edge up enough, the cover will pop up and you can slide it out in the direction of the arrow above. It’s important to have patience with this step, as it’s easy to get frustrated and be a little too forceful. You don’t want to break or scratch anything.
2. When you get the cover off, you’ll see the bracket is held on with 4 screws shown in the image below.

Taking these screws off should be pretty simple, they weren’t on too tight with my camera. You’ll need a size #00 Philips head screwdriver for this.
3. Now that you have the bracket off you’ll be able to access the adjustment screws. I could only get a photo of one with the sub standard light I was working in, but I’ve show where the others are using blue circles. The screws are numbered from 1 to 3 for reference purposes.

You’ll need a long flat head screwdriver to adjust these screws. Also, you may need to remove any “loctite” or similar residue around the screws that prevent you from turning them.
The adjustment process
Below is a description of what each screw does. Quite often you’ll only need to adjust one of these so don’t feel overwhelmed.
Screw 1: Rangefinder patch focus adjustment
Screw 2: Horizontal (left/right) adjustment for Infinity focus
Screw 3: Vertical (up/down) adjustment
*There is a 4th screw also, but to access it you need to remove the entire top plate. It calibrates the base length but you’ll hopefully not need to adjust it.Now we can start calibration. Once your camera is adjusted at infinity focus, everything should line up for close focus as well, but check just in case. My camera needed horizontal adjustment, yours might need vertical (or both). Find a place to set your camera up on a tripod where you have clear vision to something you can focus on for infinity (make sure it’s at least 5 blocks away, its better to be safe than sorry). Adjusting horizontal alignment wont affect vertical alignment, so don’t worry.
RF Patch Focus: If your rangefinder patch isn’t sharp then you’ll need to calibrate it also. Doing this first will make the other steps easier. Also, I’ve heard that adjusting this screw can sometimes move the horizontal alignment as well. I didn’t experience this but you may want to keep it in mind. Turn screw #1 to calibrate this. You may also want to do this with the Vertical alignment leaving the infinity and close focus adjustments to last. It’s not absolutely necessary though.
Horizontal: Set lens focus to infinity (use a lens you know is accurate), and then point the RF patch at an object in the distance. Adjust screw #2 which will move the patch left to right and stop when its properly aligned. Be very delicate and precise as it’s quite sensitive.
Vertical: With the lens still focused at infinity, adjust screw #3 which moves the patch up and down. It’s a larger screw and isn’t as deep as the others so it might be easier to access. Once again be very precise.
Close Focus: I’ve never done this adjustment before, so cant speak from experience. Every time I’ve adjusted at infinity the close focus has been fine. To calibrate close focus you’ll need to remove the top plate and access another screw which isn’t covered in this guide. However I’ve been told that very small adjustments can be made using screw #1. You should be adjusting your lens at 1m for close focus calibration.After you’ve adjusted all the screws for calibration you can put something on them like “loctite” that will help prevent misalignment in the future. To reassemble everything you just reverse the dis-assembly process. I’ve only had to do this once, and to be honest id you’ve had to re-calibrate several times you may want to consider why this is happening.
Update: Thanks for all the positive feedback, I’m happy this guide has been helpful to so many people. Just remember to be slow and systematic and the whole process should be complete without any issues at all.
Have fun 🙂 -
Canon P
I got this little beast a while ago now, but have only got a chance to make a post about it today.
The Canon P (“Populaire”) was made between 1958 and 1961. It’s one of Canon’s last screw mount rangefinders and regarded by many as one of the best looking rangefinders ever produced. All i know is that it works and feels great to use.
They’re were originally made as a base/basic model, but in reality were one of the last truly “bulletproof” cameras produced by Canon, so many are still working as well today as they were over 50 years ago.
There’s not too much to the camera. No light meter, so there’s no electrical issues. No fancy features that cause problems. Just a simple, clean looking camera, that works as good as it looks with a smooth film advance, and a satisfying shutter sound. The viewfinder is quite big and very bright with nice clear frame lines (maybe mine has been CLA’s recently?).
Why use a camera with no light meter and no features that make life easier? Well, its fun.
Below is a photo of mine with a Jupiter 8 attached I had lying around. The 50mm frame lines are particularly well placed in the VF, so I think a 50mm lens will live on the Canon now.
I got this camera for a steal of a price, but they regularly sell for around $100-$150, and at that price i still think they’re great value. If you want a super reliable camera, stripped back on fancy features that will take some of the greatest lenses ever created (Leica Thread Mount), then i cant think of any camera more suitable than the Canon “Populaire”.